Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spider House Cafe
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 04:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Spider House Cafe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is original research. There is no independent reliable third party sources to support that this place is "considered a center of culture in Austin, Texas" or anything else notable. Nv8200p talk 19:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added some references. --Eastmain (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think hosting a local event makes the place notable. -Nv8200p talk 02:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable establishment, fails WP:ORG. This small business was written about in a local rag, then somebody comes along and writes this up in a weaseley manner. Take that away, and not much is left. Ohconfucius (talk) 04:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A local coffeehouse that lacks notability, fails WP:ORG. Being the one-time host site of a minor local event does not give this subject the cred required by Wikipedia standards. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. Article is borderline spam. Lacks sources to support notability; as an additional point, I know this is not authoritative, but I've been there, and see little to distinguish it from just about every other mid-sized club around Austin. RayAYang (talk) 20:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I could not find any information in local publications to support any claims to notability.EagleAg04 (talk) 21:57, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.